🔗 Share this article

A man named Tomas Anez Dos Santos was laboring in a tiny glade far in the of Peru rainforest when he noticed footsteps approaching through the dense woodland.

He realized that he stood encircled, and froze.

“One person positioned, pointing using an projectile,” he recalls. “Unexpectedly he became aware that I was present and I started to run.”

He had come confronting the Mashco Piro tribe. Over many years, Tomas—residing in the small community of Nueva Oceania—served as almost a neighbour to these wandering individuals, who shun contact with strangers.

A new document issued by a human rights organisation states remain no fewer than 196 described as “isolated tribes” in existence globally. The Mashco Piro is believed to be the largest. The study claims half of these tribes may be wiped out in the next decade should administrations don't do additional measures to safeguard them.

It argues the biggest risks stem from timber harvesting, mining or drilling for crude. Remote communities are exceptionally vulnerable to ordinary illness—consequently, the study says a danger is presented by interaction with evangelical missionaries and digital content creators looking for attention.

In recent times, Mashco Piro people have been appearing to Nueva Oceania more and more, as reported by residents.

Nueva Oceania is a fishermen's village of several clans, perched atop on the shores of the Tauhamanu River in the center of the of Peru Amazon, 10 hours from the nearest town by boat.

The territory is not recognised as a safeguarded area for isolated tribes, and timber firms work here.

Tomas says that, sometimes, the racket of heavy equipment can be heard continuously, and the Mashco Piro people are observing their woodland disrupted and destroyed.

Among the locals, residents state they are torn. They are afraid of the tribal weapons but they also have deep admiration for their “relatives” who live in the woodland and wish to defend them.

“Allow them to live according to their traditions, we can't modify their culture. For this reason we maintain our separation,” explains Tomas.

Residents in Nueva Oceania are concerned about the harm to the community's way of life, the risk of aggression and the possibility that timber workers might expose the Mashco Piro to illnesses they have no defense to.

While we were in the village, the group made themselves known again. Letitia, a woman with a young child, was in the forest picking fruit when she detected them.

“There were shouting, cries from people, a large number of them. As if there was a whole group calling out,” she told us.

It was the initial occasion she had encountered the Mashco Piro and she escaped. Subsequently, her thoughts was continually racing from anxiety.

“Because exist deforestation crews and companies cutting down the jungle they're running away, maybe out of fear and they come in proximity to us,” she said. “We are uncertain how they will behave with us. That's what frightens me.”

Two years ago, a pair of timber workers were attacked by the group while angling. One man was wounded by an bow to the gut. He lived, but the other person was discovered deceased days later with multiple injuries in his body.

The Peruvian government maintains a policy of non-contact with remote tribes, rendering it forbidden to commence interactions with them.

The policy was first adopted in Brazil subsequent to prolonged of lobbying by indigenous rights groups, who noted that first interaction with secluded communities resulted to entire groups being wiped out by sickness, hardship and hunger.

In the 1980s, when the Nahau people in the country came into contact with the outside world, 50% of their population succumbed within a few years. A decade later, the Muruhanua people suffered the identical outcome.

“Remote tribes are extremely susceptible—in terms of health, any exposure might transmit illnesses, and even the simplest ones might eliminate them,” states an advocate from a tribal support group. “From a societal perspective, any contact or disruption could be highly damaging to their life and well-being as a group.”

For local residents of {